Back

Employer’s vs Contractor’s Claims under FIDIC 2017: What Changed and Why It Matters

16 September 2025

When FIDIC published the 2017 Second Edition of the Red Book, one of the most notable developments was the new regime for claims. For the first time, Employers and Contractors were placed on equal footing, with a common procedure governing both sides’ entitlements.

Then and Now

  • 1999 Red Book: Contractors were subject to stringent requirements for notifying and substantiating claims under Clause 20.1. Employers, by contrast, relied on a separate procedure under Clause 2.5, which was less onerous and often criticised as unbalanced.
  • 2017 Red Book: The distinction has been removed. Clause 20.1 now defines a “Claim” broadly as any request by either Party for entitlement or relief under the Contract. Clause 20.2 prescribes the same procedure for Employer’s and Contractor’s claims as follows:
    • Notice within 28 days of becoming aware (or when the party should reasonably have become aware) of the event or circumstance giving rise to the claim (Sub-Clause 20.2.1).
    • Fully detailed claim within 84 days, including particulars of the factual and contractual basis, any extension of time sought, and the associated quantum (Sub-Clause 20.2.4).
    • Engineer’s determination under Clause 3.7, following consultation with both parties, to reach either agreement or determination.
    • Disputes are dealt with separately under Clause 21,

Practical Guidance

  • For Employers: Treat your own claims (such as liquidated damages or set-offs) with the same rigour required of the Contractor. Establish internal claim management systems to monitor deadlines and supporting evidence, in line with Clause 20.2.
  • For Contractors: Ensure strict compliance with their own obligations under Clause 20.2 when pursuing claims, as failure to give timely notice or proper substantiation may render their claims time-barred. At the same time, Employer claims may also be vulnerable if notices are late or defective and can be resisted under Sub-Clause 20.2.1 if non-compliance is established.
  • For Both Parties: Engage constructively with the Engineer during the consultation process under Clause 3.7 to encourage early resolution and minimise escalation.

Concluding Remarks

The 2017 Red Book’s claims regime is not mere formality. It represents a deliberate move towards balanced risk allocation and predictable contract administration. Both Employers and Contractors must approach claims with equal diligence. In this environment, entitlement is preserved by compliance with the procedural requirements of Clause 20 and the Engineer’s impartial administration under Clause 3.7. For South Africa, where FIDIC 2017 is being slowly embedded into practice, this evolution signals a welcome shift towards greater fairness and certainty in contracting.

"Tiefenthaler Legal" is the trading name and brand under which the members of Tiefenthaler Legal and their respective controlled, managed, and affiliated firms and the members provide legal or other services to clients around the world. Law firms and consultancy firms that are licensed to operate under the trading name “Tiefenthaler Legal” are constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local regulatory and legal requirements and operate in accordance with their locally registered names. The use of the name “Tiefenthaler Legal”, is for description purposes only and does not imply that the Law firms and consultancy firm that operate under the trading name “Tiefenthaler Legal” are in a partnership or are part of a global firm or company. The responsibility for the provision of services to the client is defined in the terms of engagement between the instructed firm and the client. “Tiefenthaler” and the “T” logo are in the process of being registered as a trade mark by Tiefenthaler Attorneys Incorporated, which trademark is pending.

Site By Hellosquare Logo